Category talk:Sorcerer / Wizard spells

TOC

I'd like to add a TOC but only with the main sections (L1 -> L5) and not all schools. Anyone knowing how to do it can do it! (I searched a bit and did not find a direct easy way) -- Tihocan 06:30, February 10, 2006 (PST)

I did one by hand on the Knownloots page, because an automatic TOC would have had way too many levels on it, too. I'll do it for this page if you don't get to it first. Dedridd 15:46, March 7, 2006 (EST)

K will have a look at it Tihocan 17:26, March 7, 2006 (EST)

List with spell that don't have Somatic component. Possible to do in a smart way?

I think a nice feature whould be to be able to get a list with: all spell that don't have Somatic component. The reason for this is that they don't fail in heavy armor. So if someone like to roleplay a arcanecaster multiclass (like Sorcerer/Paladin) he/she could easy pick spell that don't fail in heavy armor. Is there any easy way of doing this? (As the spells are allready marked with "S" if the are using a Somatic component) //Naryas 00:40, February 14, 2006 (PST)

Try.... Featherfall. I have checked this before and I believe that it is the only one. Unlike NWN, you can't pull the heavy armor wizard in this game. KakarisMaelstrom 17:26, April 27, 2006 (EDT)

Not sure how it would be possible to do it easily. We could add a category "No somatic component", but that's not really smart ;) Tihocan 11:08, April 28, 2006 (EDT)

Tested divine / arcane crossover

I tried both, L1 sorc -> L4 Pally,and a theurge, L1 sorc -> L3 cleric. Before update 5, if I had heavy armor prof, then I had no failure (except for shields) but this is not the case anyore. Furthermore they haven't added still spell feat, and have infact, made all spells subject to arcane failure. The only real option is to carry around a good robe, and have it hotbar'd next to your heavy armor. Swapping robe -> heavy takes some time, heavy -> robe is instant tho ... This would allow oneself to buff or switch roles w/o failure but a lower AC of course. Hope this helps some. Matt.

Have you registered? Also, your spaces were screwing with things - they are used to designate code snippets (-: (post by Peerless - see his talk and contribs.) 21:20, February 19, 2006 (PST)

Thx for the edit, Im new to this :P I just signed up as DnD Nut

Make sure to login now - you are still logged out according to the edit history. And to sign your posts, all you have to use is four tildes - like this: ~~~~ it will automagically generate you a signature with a date of the post and everything (-: (post by Peerless - see his talk and contribs.) 16:55, February 21, 2006 (PST)

Cool thx 4 the tip, guess I should read the posting help thread lol -- DnD Nut 13:49, February 22, 2006 (EST)

Also, use colons to indent the replies - helps make the conversation follow-able (-: (post by Peerless - see his talk and contribs.) 14:19, February 22, 2006 (EST)

Otto's

Can someone confirm whether Otto's Resistable Dance is available to Wizards and Sorcerers? It's listed on this category page, but the detailed page for it says it's only a Bard spell. Also double check the spell level on it. Dedridd 12:16, February 23, 2006 (EST)

My wizard has Otto's --Uky

Chill Touch

The estimated formula's way off now... just make a L1 caster with it... doesn't do near that much damage. --Uky

Yea was rather wrong. I updated the page with proper verified damage dice. Removing page from disputed facts. --Shade 08:18, September 6, 2011 (EDT)

Formatting

I'm seeing a lot of things bolded in this article - but bolded via '''' and not using the DDO template. Is this just zealous emphasizing? Or is this formatting supposed to denote verified information? If if it's for verified, up-to-date information, then the template should be used, to the best of my understanding of Tihocan's master plan (reference: DDO numbers). Dedridd 14:55, March 7, 2006 (EST)

I agree - this page in specific is QUITE uglified. I think I'll try to clean it up a bit. (post by Peerless - see his talk and contribs.)

Yes, I said so to the guy who put all the bold. I plan to fix it as soon as I have time, which should be tomorrow. Today's been much too busy, unfortunately. I need to write the policy on how to format data so that it is clear for everyone. Tihocan 15:20, March 7, 2006 (EST)

I'm not sure if you mean you said not to bold, or to use the template? If the template just applies bold formatting, the latter isn't going to change the legibility (or lack thereof). I would question the necessity of marking some of the data that's currently bold, but I'm satisifed if this is something you're already planning on handling. Dedridd 15:40, March 7, 2006 (EST)

Yea this should be it's own page, not a category hijack

While i do like the category and subcategory links here.. I think this page is way too long (way over the recommended 32kb size..) So I'm gona move it to it's own page, and probably just add some links to the bottom for the interesting sub category pages. Just will be better to have a smaller cleaner main category page for people just searching categories as normal, and not looking for such a huge slow loading page.

Already moved some other pages like that around, and they had discussion that mostly agreed to do so.. This ones missing that, but don't see any reason not too, but I'll wait a day since this is a very high traffic page. To see if anyone has any objections. --Shade 08:22, September 6, 2011 (EDT)