Talk:Energy Absorption

Stacking
Forum post leads me to believe that this stacks just like Healing Amplification where as 10% + 15% + 20% + 33% + 50% = 1 - (.9 * .85 * .8 * .67 * .58) = 79% Absorption..

So, 100 points of &lt;type&gt; damage would be 100 - 79% = 21 damage taken. NOT, 100 - (128%) = 0 damage taken (28 point heal)..

Or, 240 points of &lt;type&gt; damage would be 240 - 79% = 251 damage taken. NOT, 240 - (128%) = 0 damage taken (67 point heal)..

Or, 2,261 points of &lt;type&gt; damage would be 2,261 - 79% = 475 damage taken. NOT, 2,261 - (128%) = 0 damage taken (633 point heal)..

Is this correct? ShoeMaker 16:15, January 21, 2012 (EST)


 * I'm heading to bed now, if above is correct, please make stacking note on main page of article. Thank you. ShoeMaker 02:47, January 22, 2012 (EST)


 * Maybe a specific lava pool or something? I'm thinking that the pool at the Black Anvil Mines always ticked for 18-22?  Maybe in the PvP pit with a caster with metas and amp gear off so they "Always" get the same number Non-Crit?  I'll have to do some more research on how to test it I guess.. ShoeMaker 10:29, January 22, 2012 (EST)


 * Use one of the Eternal wands to test it? IE +5 Eternal Wand of Frost/Starter wand Yawgmoth 17:15, January 22, 2012 (EST)

Is this stacking formula correct as of 2017 as well? anyone know? -- yoko5000 (Contribs • Message • Email ) 13:09, March 18, 2017 (EDT)

Name
Is this the correct name or should it be Elemental Absorption? Or both?

&rArr; Mogafi (Contribs • Message • Email ) 13:09, August 23, 2018 (EDT)