Template talk:Unsigned

Separators
JJ, I saw that you changed the look of the separators from to use ! instead. Was there a technical reason for this change? If so, it will need to be done correctly or we can change the separator. I intentionally wanted the tags in there for the background color formatting they offer, I'm not opposed to a single set of tags wrapping the whole thing either. I know that pipes can cause issues if used in other templates or as your default signature, and am also not opposed to changing them to •, •, ·, ·, or something else appropriate. ShoeMaker (Contributions • Message) 08:12, May 30, 2014 (EDT)
 * No technical reason. I was trying to get rid of the background color change tags have. I think it looks bad on a non-white background. The symbol choice doesn't matter to me.&thinsp;&mdash;&thinsp;Zav&thinsp; (C&middot;T&middot;E) 19:03, May 30, 2014 (EDT)
 * Yeah, and I had put it there exclusively for the background color change so that the links would be visible on any background and not be hidden. Do you think it would look better with just a single set of code tags wrapping the whole thing? ShoeMaker (Contributions • Message) 19:51, May 30, 2014 (EDT)
 * As it is now, there is only "white" around the | 's. I think ( b would be better than it is now. Personally, I like it without any white provided by tags.&thinsp;&mdash;&thinsp;Zav&thinsp; (C&middot;T&middot;E) 20:41, May 30, 2014 (EDT)