User talk:Technical 13/2012/2

Template: xxxxxx tooltip
Not sure if you are aware or not, but tooltip template's are not working right on the Vector layout of the site. All data in the tooltip just blobs out on the screen upon load. Look at the experience point page or the marketplace bazaar page that i've been working on Ague 19:25, April 3, 2012 (EDT)


 * The non-Trueglass skins were never modified to accommodate tool-tip pop-ups as far as I am aware of. I'm not ambitious  enough to rework those skins right now. I'm expecting DDO wiki to be upgraded to MW 1.19 sometime this summer which is suppose to replace most of the current skins with the new standards.  I just see no point in modifying any skins until after that point in time.  I recommend using the Trueglass2 skin (wiki default) or the Trueglass skin (Mostly the same except the toolbox buffer stuffs are on the right instead of left which helps with preventing pop-ups from running off the screen and the one that I personally use).  I also plan on at that point fixing the tool-tips to detect screen edges and display accordingly and creating a "mobile device friendly" skin for all of those iPhones, BlackBerries, and Androids...  ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 20:28, April 3, 2012 (EDT)


 * Unless I am mistaken, Vector.css popups should be fixed now. ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 15:23, April 5, 2012 (EDT)

Category pages - what should be on them?
If you compare Category:Rune Arms and Category:Weapon Modules, rune arms just have a short placeholder text that refers to the main article... that's the way things are at wikipedia. Not that we necessarily need to do things their way... Then again, maybe the category page is a bit superfluous, if there are no named modules in the game yet... Carte (Contributions &bull; Message) 20:17, April 5, 2012 (EDT)


 * If there is a main article, as with Weapon Module, you can simply include it on the Category page by calling it like . ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 08:05, April 6, 2012 (EDT)

Named Armor template update

 * If I understand your request, the edit I just made should take care of it.

I replaced " " with "  "> ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 15:14, April 15, 2012 (EDT)

Patrolling

 * Is the page you are trying to patrol marked with a (maybe green, maybe not) "N"? The ability to patrol new pages is bugged (Bugzilla 35810).  If so, please vote it up in priority! If not, can you link the edit that is giving you troubles?

ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 14:16, April 18, 2012 (EDT)


 * Yeah because I hit [mark this page as patrolled]. I still think it is because most of them are new pages, of which you can patrol all except the initial creation/edit. Any more detail you can give me would be appreciated.

ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 16:52, April 18, 2012 (EDT)

If you have noticed the inability to patrol new pages bug (35810), please vote for it on Bugzilla! This will cause the devs to take a look at it without having to wait 3-4 years for a fix! ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 07:47, April 19, 2012 (EDT)

113.128.*.*
NetRange:      113.0.0.0 - 113.255.255.255 CIDR:          113.0.0.0/8 OriginAS: NetName:       APNIC-113 NetHandle:     NET-113-0-0-0-1 Parent: NetType:       Allocated to APNIC Comment:       This IP address range is not registered in the ARIN database. Comment:       For details, refer to the APNIC Whois Database via Comment:       WHOIS.APNIC.NET or http://wq.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl Comment:        ** IMPORTANT NOTE: APNIC is the Regional Internet Registry Comment:       for the Asia Pacific region. APNIC does not operate networks Comment:       using this IP address range and is not able to investigate Comment:       spam or abuse reports relating to these addresses. For more Comment:       help, refer to http://www.apnic.net/apnic-info/whois_search2/abuse-and-spamming RegDate:       2008-05-27 Updated:       2010-07-30 Ref:           http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-113-0-0-0-1 OrgName:       Asia Pacific Network Information Centre OrgId:         APNIC Address:       PO Box 3646 City:          South Brisbane StateProv:     QLD PostalCode:    4101 Country:       AU RegDate: Updated:       2012-01-24 Ref:           http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/APNIC ReferralServer: whois://whois.apnic.net OrgTechHandle: AWC12-ARIN OrgTechName:  APNIC Whois Contact OrgTechPhone: +61 7 3858 3188 OrgTechEmail: search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net OrgTechRef:   http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/AWC12-ARIN OrgAbuseHandle: AWC12-ARIN OrgAbuseName:  APNIC Whois Contact OrgAbusePhone: +61 7 3858 3188 OrgAbuseEmail: search-apnic-not-arin@apnic.net OrgAbuseRef:   http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/AWC12-ARIN
 * 1) The following results may also be obtained via:
 * 2) http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=113.128.161.189?showDetails=true&showARIN=false&ext=netref2
 * 1) http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=113.128.161.189?showDetails=true&showARIN=false&ext=netref2
 * 1) ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use
 * 2) available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html
 * 1) available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html

Deferred to specific whois server: whois.apnic.net... % [whois.apnic.net node-2] % Whois data copyright terms   http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html inetnum:       113.128.0.0 - 113.129.255.255 netname:       CHINANET-SD descr:         CHINANET SHANDONG PROVINCE NETWORK descr:         China Telecom descr:         No.31,jingrong street descr:         Beijing 100032 country:       CN admin-c:        CH93-AP tech-c:        XR55-AP remarks:       service provider status:        ALLOCATED PORTABLE mnt-by:        APNIC-HM mnt-lower:     MAINT-CHINANET-SD mnt-routes:    MAINT-CHINANET-SD remarks:       -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ remarks:       This object can only be updated by APNIC hostmasters. remarks:       To update this object, please contact APNIC remarks:       hostmasters and include your organisation's account remarks:       name in the subject line. remarks:       -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ changed:       hm-changed@apnic.net 20081103 source:        APNIC person:        Chinanet Hostmaster nic-hdl:       CH93-AP e-mail:        anti-spam@ns.chinanet.cn.net address:       No.31 ,jingrong street,beijing address:       100032 phone:         +86-10-58501724 fax-no:        +86-10-58501724 country:       CN changed:        dingsy@cndata.com 20070416 mnt-by:        MAINT-CHINANET source:        APNIC person:        Xin    Ruosheng nic-hdl:       XR55-AP e-mail:        ipreport@sdtele.com address:       No.999,    road    Shunhua,    Jinan,    Shandong    province,China phone:         +86-531-83190000 fax-no:        +86-531-83190000 country:       CN changed:        ipreport@sdtele.com  20060905 mnt-by:        MAINT-CHINANET-SD source:        APNIC I know I joked about it on IRC, but I think adding 113.128.0.0/16 to the Special:Block is looking like a more and more reasonable idea, as they've modified your edits each day for the past week, twice prior on April 24th, per the log. "Tauro" (Contributions &bull; ) 03:11, May 7, 2012 (EDT)


 * yep, that makes.... Atleast 9 of em... And of course, the only thing harder then getting a Chinese ISP to block or do anything, is getting Tibet freed ^.^

Yawgmoth ( IRC &bull; Message ) 05:07, May 7, 2012 (EDT)


 * Blocked for a week I think I set it to... Let's see what happens because I'm not sure if blocking on the wiki will work like that... *Crosses Fingers*

ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; ) 09:39, May 7, 2012 (EDT)


 * This subnet's due to expire in a few days. I think if we get hit again, I'm thinking a much longer block term might be in order

"Tauro" (Contributions &bull; ) 22:26, May 11, 2012 (EDT)


 * I'm thinking three months.

ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; ) 23:14, May 11, 2012 (EDT)

59.151.120.47
% [whois.apnic.net node-1] % Whois data copyright terms http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html

inetnum: 59.151.0.0 - 59.151.127.255 netname: CHINA-21VIANET descr: 21ViaNet(China),Inc. descr: Beijing, China country: CN admin-c: WH381-AP tech-c: WH381-AP mnt-by: MAINT-CNNIC-AP mnt-routes: MAINT-CNNIC-AP mnt-irt: IRT-CNNIC-CN status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE changed: [Email Removed] 20110311 source: APNIC

route: 59.151.96.0/19 descr: CHINA-ABITCOOL descr: Abitcool(China) Inc. country: CN origin: AS17428 mnt-by: MAINT-CNNIC-AP changed: [Email Removed] 20050324 source: APNIC

person: Wei He nic-hdl: WH381-AP e-mail: [Email Removed] address: BOE Science Park, 10 Jiuxianqiao Road, Chaoyang District address: Beijing, China, 100016 phone: +86-10-84562121 fax-no: +86-10-84564234 country: CN changed: [Email Removed] 20111118 mnt-by: MAINT-CN-YANGYT source: APNIC

Read more: http://www.whatismyip.com/tools/ip-whois-lookup.asp?ref=tool_menu_foot#ixzz1uZfMeeRO Am I going to have to put up a block on this range too? *Sigh* ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; ) 11:15, May 11, 2012 (EDT)


 * well.. we know how to do it, 59.151.0.0/16 will block that entire subnet. Doing some research to see if this is some bot or if it's someone behind this.

"Tauro" (Contributions &bull; ) 15:57, May 11, 2012 (EDT)

Grammar

 * Poor cat. ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; ) 21:08, May 3, 2012 (EDT)

Redirect 'bug'
While I was updating the Greater Essence images, I noticed when I clicked the template's link greater magical essences in description, which is supposed to redirect to Cannith Crafting, however it only loads the full Cannith Crafting article and doesn't move to the specified subsection. Example: Greater Water Essence Let me know what you find out. "Tauro" (Contributions <span style="text-decoration: blink; color: #FF7F00;">&bull; ) 12:14, May 5, 2012 (EDT)


 * Fully works now, at least it does for me. ShoeMaker (Contributions <span style="text-decoration: blink; color: #FF00AA;">&bull; ) 12:52, May 5, 2012 (EDT)

!Craps IRC Chat Results
!Craps >10 trial results:

11 Trials: Points of 4,5,6,9,10

13 Trials: Points of 5,8,9,10

14 Trials: Point of 8

19 Trials: Point of 4

20 Trials: Point of 10

22 Trials: Point of 8

33 Trials: Point of 4

May not be a lot of data (14 points, in fact) but still a good start.

Habreno (Contributions &bull; Message) 17:40, June 7, 2012 (EDT)

Recent Deletion: Goristro
I suspect you've been a bit too zealous in the recent anti-spam measures. The article Goristro - well, actually the two links there - while it did not really conform to wiki standards, it's not spam.--Cru121 (Contributions &bull; Message) 07:31, June 13, 2012 (EDT)

I guess this would also mean unblocking http://ddowiki.com/page/Special:Contributions/186.115.91.118

File:CliffhangersDebut.jpg
This is George Ho from English Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:George_Ho). I must say that this image.... it is no longer necessary and needed. This image is actually replaceable by text, as explanation of the rules is sufficient enough for this game. Actually, Cliff Hangers article was moved to the list some time ago, and the image loses its ability to help readers understand it anymore. To reply, try to contact me by clicking a link to my user talk page. Time to delete it? --173.51.200.210 15:22, June 13, 2012 (EDT)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CliffhangersDebut.jpg
 * I made replies there. You can add my user page to your watchlist in Wikipedia, so you can see me replying to you. --173.51.200.210 18:05, June 13, 2012 (EDT)

Thanks for the welcome!
I never know exactly how to message and edit on these talk pages, so please forgive me for my errors. Thanks for the welcome! I've been here for a little while. I'm not terribly wiki savvy. But, I'll come and needle from time to time when I'm looking for information that I can't find.

Like right now. I'm dying to remember what spell it is that those damned Qar Dat Warpriests cast that creates the big force cage looking animation in quests like The Shipwrecked Spy. I was pretty sure it's not a player castable spell. And, of course, I was here on the DDO wiki looking for it.

Anyway, cheers, and well met! :D --Cauthey (Contributions &bull; Message) 13:12, June 15, 2012 (EDT)


 * New messages usually go on the bottom of talk/discussion pages. Other than that, some people request that the  be used on their talk pages (and will put your post into it if it is not).  I could care less myself (although I do respond using it because it looks nicer)... Anyways, the spell you are looking for is a level 4 divine spell called Order's Wrath, and yes, PCs can use it. ShoeMaker (Contributions <span style="text-decoration: blink; color: #FF00AA;">&bull; ) 14:02, June 15, 2012 (EDT)

Awesome, thanks for the help! :D Cauthey (Contributions &bull; Message) 14:15, June 15, 2012 (EDT)