Item talk:Mournlode Armors

Pictures
Hey, do not you guys thinks it would be good to have PICTURES of those armors?

I think it would be good. But, I do not want to make an account here to upload pictures. Not just yet. 87.228.59.6 06:44, April 14, 2012 (EDT)
 * Would be great to have pictures of the armor. But being I don't own most of the armors, it's tough to get screen-shots of em. I encourage you to re-consider creating an account and contributing. It takes all of 30 seconds to sign up. Zero personal information is required, nor even a valid email is required, you may make one up - email confirmation is optional and can unlock additional privileges, though nothing really relevant (lets you edit maybe 2 locked pages on the wiki, nothing related to uploading files - anyone registered may do that). --Shade (Contributions &bull; Message) 07:30, April 14, 2012 (EDT)
 * I second what said.  It's as simple as picking a user name, password, entering the same type of CAPTCHA you had to enter to make this post, and you are done.  Further-more, uploads count as edits, and when you near 100 edits, the requirement to enter the CAPTCHA security codes goes away. -- ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; Message) 10:26, April 14, 2012 (EDT)

Item versioning policy

 * My opinion is that Cavalry_Plate is as good an example of an ideal format. An item page for each version of the item, and a non-item page listing information about all versions of the item.
 * Separating out the different versions of the item is good because it allows for instances where a different version has different properties, like Item:Cavalry_Plate_(Level_16) that is medium armor, and Item:Cavalry_Plate_(Level_12) that is heavy armor.
 * *Disclaimer : I have suggested this in the past, but have gotten some opposition due to the work involved in creating / maintaining different versions though.