DDO wiki talk:Administrators/promote/Faltout

>

Having edited for year(s) and accumulating almost 1k edits with no significant gaps in the last year, I think Faltout would make a great administrator should he choose to accept the nomination. User has also shown exceptional technical knowledge and probably would benefit from the right to modify admin-protected pages. &rArr; Cru121 (Contribs • Message • Email ) 00:44, April 2, 2018 (EDT)
 * User has only edited consistently for the last 4 month(s), has gaps of more than a month and multiple gaps of more than 3 weeks in the last year (and no edits from April-August of 2017) which disqualifies them per DDO:Administrators. While they're on the right track, I still think it's too soon and we have no shortage of administrators.  &#x1f45f;&thinsp;ShoeMaker (Contribs&thinsp;•&thinsp;Message&thinsp;•&thinsp;Email )&thinsp;&#x1f45f; 03:59, April 3, 2018 (EDT)

Second attempt
After 3 months, I would like to suggest Faltout for promotion again, at least probational. We don't have too many active admins these days. -- &rArr; Cru121 (Contribs • Message • Email ) 00:35, June 28, 2018 (EDT)
 * A user who had to be blocked for disruption who is  to cause mass disruption again if he doesn't get his way does not a good administrator make.  &#x1f45f;&thinsp;ShoeMaker (Contribs&thinsp;•&thinsp;Message&thinsp;•&thinsp;Email )&thinsp;&#x1f45f; 01:23, June 28, 2018 (EDT)
 * While I don't have an opinion on my possible promotion/demotion/ban/whatever, I never caused disruption. This block was totally unwarranted and not based on any blocking policy or editing guideline. I did everything by the book. And applying changes that nobody had commented on for a month is again not disruption, it's getting things done. And something needs to be done if the wiki is to stop being referenced as "an outdated source with conficting info". &rArr; Faltout (Contribs • Message • Email ) 01:46, June 28, 2018 (EDT)