Talk:Template picture size 420 vs 434


 * It is fine to have your image come out to 434px wide, if that is what looks the best... When you upload it, and the template renders it on the page, it will automatically resize it to 420px... No need to worry. Just crop it as crisp as you can, and don't cut off too much of the border... I simply use MS-Paint for my screenshots, even though I have gimp as well if I want to make it a special screenshot (occasionally I'll make one with a transparent background if I think the item is too epic to crop the wings off.

ShoeMaker (Contributions &bull; ) 23:02, August 21, 2012 (EDT)


 * Okay. But still the text in a description window is more clear if it is not resized either by me or by the wiki. Again, was just curious about the choice (or lack thereof if it is the wiki software that does it). It would be nice if there was no trade off in how crisp the text was. Yes, people could click the picture and get a 434 pixel version, but it wouldn't be on the page with the rest of the stuff, and I didn't really think about clicking on an image until I saw it mentioned. This may seem to be nit picking, but I am a very curious person. I was very happy with how GIMP lets me zoom in and adjust the corners of a selection for cropping one at a time. Useraverage (Contributions &bull; Message) 23:46, August 21, 2012 (EDT)