Template talk:Adpack

the rationale behind this template is so that editors/contributors can have a better way of saying that an area or quest needs access to a particular adventure pack, instead of just saying "This is Pay-to-Play", which is a misleading statement because F2P and Premium is not required to pay real money to get access to adpacks. Is red too distracting or alarming? ;-) -Sef326 05:39, November 26, 2009 (EST)

To me, this template creates nonintuitive text/link(s). Using "Tangleroot Gorge" as an example with underlines for links (just here, not on the actual pages), it currently creates "Requires Access to Tangleroot Gorge adventure pack " (only a link to the list of adventure packs, e.g., Assault on Splinterskull) OR "Requires Access to Tangleroot Gorge Adventure Pack " (links to the Tangleroot Gorge page and to the list of adventure packs, e.g., The Hobgoblins' Captives). I don't know how it chooses between the first and second. I would like to change it to "Requires Access to the Tangleroot Gorge Adventure Pack " (only a link to the Tangleroot Gorge adventure pack). On the Tangleroot Gorge page itself, it could be "Main page for the Tangleroot Gorge adventure pack " (only a link to the list of adventure packs) with perhaps an orange text background instead of a the blue one used for the quests in the adventure packs. Anyone object? GregJ 14:15, October 24, 2011 (EDT)

I see your point; however, it has pretty much been established that the name of the pack is the link to the pack and adventure pack is a list of packs. People tend to not like changes in how things work. What I may suggest, and/or do myself, is to instead change the color of the second link and make the popups of where the link goes under the mouse cursor be more specific. -- ShoeMaker 09:45, October 27, 2011 (EDT)