Category talk:Item effect templates

Deprecate?
Should this be deprecated in favor of Category:Item description templates? Should its members be merged into other templates? The design principle is unclear to me. &rArr; Hoopy Froodle (Contribs • Message • Email ) 11:31, July 13, 2019 (EDT)
 * I guess it should be merged. Perhaps ask Tech on his talk page. -- &rArr; Cru121 (Contribs • Message • Email ) 11:46, July 13, 2019 (EDT)
 * Not deprecated but I'm not opposed to a merge. I'm thinking it should be merged into "effect" as opposed to "description" as that's a more appropriate description of the category of effects. &rArr; DDOstream (Contribs • Message • Email ) 09:19, July 17, 2019 (EDT)
 * DDOStream I agree in principle. I'm just daunted by the number of pages/subcategories currently in C:Item description templates. Could they be recategorized by bot? &rArr; Hoopy Froodle (Contribs • Message • Email ) 10:22, July 19, 2019 (EDT)
 * I have no issue recategorizing with . &#x1f45f;&thinsp;ShoeMaker (Contribs&thinsp;•&thinsp;Message&thinsp;•&thinsp;Email )&thinsp;&#x1f45f; 08:41, October 28, 2020 (EDT)
 * I am in favor of merging the categories as suggested. No relevant comments. &rArr; MrLizard (Contribs • Message • Email ) 23:51, October 27, 2020 (EDT)