User talk:24.131.94.245

Excuse me, why did you add that to our quests page? You need to update the list that is here, not go saying it's out of date and posting your own. I won't block you right now, but please don't do that again. Thanks! Elliott Cable -  ?+¿  -  ‹·›  22:39, June 14, 2006 (EDT)


 * You have a very strange notion of how to run a wiki. I added extra information to the page.  What I said was completely accurate, I didn't vandalize anything, and since I did not have the time to update the whole page myself, I posted a link to allow someone else to do so. What you've done by reverting the version is to take the information you proport to provide OFF the page and make it inaccessible.  I did not write that other link.  I found it because your site was inaccurate. I seriously think you need to revisit your collabartion policies if you're threatening a ban under such circumstances.  If you do not your site will never become useful. The previous unsigned comment was left by the owner of this page


 * You posted a link to another site, off of the wiki - I consider that rooting for free advertising. If there is good information on that page which the wiki does not have, then somebody needs to import it to the wiki and keep everything centralized. Oh, and I don't need this site to become useful - it already is. Thanks for your (lack) of contributions. Oh - also, it's not "my" wiki - it's the communitie's site, run by the community. If you noticed, there are no ads - this site takes me around 200$ into the red. I run it for the benefit of the players, not for profit - so don't go getting all righteous on me. Elliott Cable  -  ?+¿  -  ‹·›  18:35, June 15, 2006 (EDT)


 * Okay, I now see where you're coming from. I apologize.  It was solely my intention to share additional information that would be usful to the users and community given my time constraints at the time.  I too believe in Wikis and shared communities and my public offerings on servers I run cost me well over $200 a month.   Is it your policy to have no offsite links whatsoever?  Offsite links in certain sections are standard (e.g. bottom of wikipedia pages) in most Wikis, so perhaps a policy page describing what is and what is not appropriate for this wiki would be helpful.  Thank you for your contribution and administration time and work for all of us.


 * 4th time so far I've had an anonymous user completly turn around on me lol - maybe I shouldn't be so judgemental. Grr, sorry, wiki administration gets to you real quick like - I don't have time to leave much of a comment right now, for now put it in a  ==See also==  section at the bottom, with a description in the link code. Or I might later. Perhaps leave a note with it too, somebody with more time than me could try to import some of this information - better yet, why don't you leave a note on the discussion page for that list, so one of our crazy-dedicated editors'll notice and take care of the import? Or maybe another passer-by will - thanks for cooling this off before it got too hot, I was definitely in the wrong, sorry. I've just had problems with guild leaders and other websites' administrators and such in the past come by and do stuff like that, I've developed a hard-coded reaction to seeing an anonymous editor add an external URL at the top of the article. More on this later, gotta go - might wanna register an account too, most of us go easier on non-anonymous users. Up to you, it's not a requirement (-: Elliott Cable  -  ?+¿  -  ‹·›  21:24, June 15, 2006 (EDT)