Talk:SC wiki update/Enhancements

Class enhancement

 * yk5: tag all done
 * need to fix the usage of Template:ClassTOC too

Racial enhancement

 * yk5: move and tag done, up to Warforged, didnt touch Iconics
 * Nibelung: All racial enhancements are done and up to date as of U19.

Prestige enhancement

 * archived Template:EnhancementsTOC/PreU19 just for in case
 * move and mostly done, not touching misc placeholder pages, not sure on some points (such as Sorc Savant rename etc) waiting on RN release and live confirmation
 * Barbarian, Cleric, Fighter, Monk, Paladin, Ranger, Rogue, Sorcerer, and Wizard enhancements are up to date as of U19.

Misc

 * Action boost
 * Capstone enhancements
 * Faith based enhancements
 * Multiclass enhancements
 * Turn Undead enhancements
 * Extra Dragonmark Use
 * Racial Summoning
 * Ability Score Icons

Discussion
if no objection, we will be and i think that will be as soon as the servers go down for the update, but holy moly, its quite a bit of task! any idea? yoko5000 (Contributions • Message) 05:47, August 12, 2013 (EDT)
 * 1st moving existing enhancement pages to (history) ,
 * adding tag to the page
 * then move (Lamania) pages to the  original location making the way to move
 * and delete the redirect.


 * Sounds good. Though is all the moving necessary? I guess races must be moved, because they will be rewritten, but classes could be kept as is? Isn't history tag enough? (I might have missed an established policy here)

What about the names of enhancement pages for the rest of iconic heroes. I would prefer to use only the name of the race if possible. But feel free to overrule me.
 * Purple Dragon Knight enhancements (or perhaps Cormyrian/Cormyrean enhancements?)
 * Bladeforged enhancements (and NOT Bladeforged Paladin enhancements)
 * Shadar-kai enhancements
 * Sun-elf enhancements (elf/Elf?)

Also, In_development/Enhancements should be updated and then merged with Enhancements page. OR simply just update Enhancements I guess. --Cru121 (Contributions • Message) 09:00, August 12, 2013 (EDT)



i was thinking class enhancement pages are getting replaced with "as a Fighter you can shoose from this tree and that tree" kinda short description but yea, maybe thats not all that neccesary.

agree with not "Bladeforged Paladin enhancements". i still think even Iconic pages shouldnt be like that, if you ask me. not sure about Shadar-kai/Kai, Sun-elf/Elf, PDK/Cormyrian but we should follow in-game description (character creation panel and player examine panel) but ofc Lamania is down atm, doh! yoko5000 (Contributions • Message) 01:21, August 13, 2013 (EDT)


 * Class enh pages: We could add the links to new trees on top for Fighter enhancements article, then add History tag and keep everything below. But I don't care either way.

--Cru121 (Contributions • Message) 03:19, August 13, 2013 (EDT)


 * Is there any way to put the 'update' template onto all of the lamannia enhancement pages with a bot? This would make sure they get the most recent info from Lamannia/Live. I'm starting to revisit the Rogue and Wizard enhancements. Let's see how far I'll get.

Krlkch (Contributions • Message) 05:34, August 16, 2013 (EDT)


 * I think it would be enough if we use Lamannia tag for incomplete articles and remove Lama (on Monday) for those updated and verified live.

--Cru121 (Contributions • Message) 06:37, August 16, 2013 (EDT)


 * Yep, that'd work. I did the rogue enhancements, but I don't think that I'm going to be able to take care of the wizard ones, too. Krlkch (Contributions • Message) 05:34, August 17, 2013 (EDT)


 * TOC'ed all enhancement pages. I intend to update all racial trees today. Nibelung (Contributions • Message) 14:40, August 24, 2013 (EDT)