Item Enchantments categories
- Terms "Item" ,"Damage", "Modifier" only if needed, no need to double up on using the same terms from a previous branch unless to differentiate from another category.
- Items > Effects or Enchantments or Enhancements >
- if Monster dealing "HP/Stat Damage": Damage > Critical > Bloodletter
- if Player dealing "HP/Stat Protection": Protection > Absorption > Acid Absorption
- if Monster and player "HP/Stat Damage &/or Vicious/ Vamprism": Damage > effect type
- Group where possible, else , don't group for "cause" it sounds nice over here
Follow ing is not / will not be entire C: just some brain storm examples
- Absorption >
- Acid Absorption
- Cold Absorption
- Fire Absorption
- Electricity Absorption
- Sonic Absorption
- Negative Energy Absorption
- Ability >
- Ogre Power
- Ability damage >
- Bone breaking
- Charisma damage (Use DnD term if any)
- Concealment >
- On Critical >
- Lesser Bloodletter >
- Improved Bloodletter
- Greater Bloodletter
- Superior Bloodletter
- Damage Reduction >
- Cold Iron
- Alignment >
- Pure Good
- Good Burst
- Good Blast
- Spell Point
 ToDo List
The Circle is [almost] complete, now to do it all again... for U17
 Project: A.R.M.O.R.
Analyze and Replace Metonymy of Reproductions
This one take a while.
- Update all Armor Images to Appropriate File Naming. Replace Low quality pic desc and pics.
- Collecting Material Turn-is
- Collecting Images
- Tag Missing Armor
In Progress of obtaining or editing:
- Dragon Armor
Black Dragon Armor 10/10 - In Progress
Blue Dragon Armor 10/10 - Complete
White Dragon Armor 10/10 - Complete
Update Armor Group 1 - Complete
Update Armor Group 2 - Complete
Update Armor Group 3 - Complete
- DragonTouch 11/12 (Missing Leather) - In Progress
- Update Armor Group Epic - In Progress (Partial)
Emerald Claw - In Progress
Silver Flame - In Progress
- Vaults of the Artificers Armors - Standby
- Update 14 - In Progress
- C. Red Dragon - 4/5
- C. Green Dragon - HQ All
- Move Armor Pages to Item: <<Name>>
 Project: D.O.C.E.N.T.
*Update all Docents to U14 - Complete/U14
- Update all non Epic docents: 2 remain, Stone of Heart, Green Scale Docent
Tag MIA Epic Docents
Tag Docent of Shadows lv 1 - 12 Have to wait to Mabar event.
- Vaults of the Artificers Docent
 Project: S.H.I.E.L.D.
Create a Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division
- Update all shields to U14 - In progress
Tag Epic shields
Tag Special shields
Tag Rare Turn-in shields
- Tag Cove Shields - There really has to be a simpler way for all those tiers I think I found it
 Project: P.O.T.S.
- Potion Template (Still needs some adjustments) - 02.05.13
- Guild Renown
- Jewel of Fortune
 Project: E.V.E.N.T.S.
# Event Main Page - Note Draft is in Bladedge template Sandbox
- Edit Crystal Cove: add the missing pic or two, resize tables to appear more uniform with each other
Edit Mabar : Add some pics, Reorganize, add headers.
 Project: S.P.E.L.L.S.
Class Spells Pages to do list
Ranger (test page)
Pally (well wasn't ask to stop after ranger)
Clr/FvS (cut and paste -1, unless the pages are merge, multi parts <s>1-4, 5-7, 8-9)
Figure out How to collapse in line text some descriptions are to long.(Abandoned)
Sor/Wiz (multi parts 1-3, 4-6, 7-9)
Art (very very last, so last that there are no red links on the page) Thnakyou Akwyp
- Druids Update when have druid or when Turbine updates their Compendium.
17:27, September 20, 2011 (EDT)
 Project: Q.U.E.S.T.
 Project: R.E.P.L.A.C.E.
Would you like to know more?
Got this warning when I was Previewing the update I was making to the bard spells
Warning: This page is 33 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections.
Should I ignore or break the page up?
15:31, September 25, 2011 (EDT)
I would ignore it for now.. There are a few pages that go way over that.. I don't worry much about it until it gets to 50kb. Some pages are even larger than that..
Is there any way to hide/ collapse lines of texts (not a table) from view until the reader decides to select "show" to view it it?
As far as I know, the closest thing to that is a popup.. You have many options for popups:
I hope this helps with what you are looking for
I was thinking of something more of what is shown here http://snippets.wikidot.com/code:collapsible-text-block
Found what I was looking for a few months later.
 User page tabs
You need to copy the entire structure into your user space.. I'll set up an instruction page later, and maybe once I get a response from Xevo
) on something, I will be able to build some of it into the wikis common css.. I'll let you know when the instruction page is ready.. Thinking I'll put it here
The information you requested can be found here
. I do intend to rewrite most of it and make it more user friendly to understand.. Simply follow the 12 steps outlined replacing any instance you see of "<your user name>
" with "Bladedge". Be careful because there are "<your user name>"s hidden inside the C & P code as well as the page names..
Join us on the IRC
, we need more admins available for questions/idleing. Trying to get all the admins in here
When editing a page, if you look just under the [Save page] [Show preview] [Show changes] Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
line, there is a dropdown list box that has a default of "Standard" in it... If you scroll down through the list in the box, "most" of our used templates are listed in there someplace, with simple how to use instructions embedded in each one. Some of it still needs some formating to be easier to read, and the item enhancement templates that start with 'S' still need to be added, but this new feature should save you a lot of time researching which template to use, or copy and paste time... just click and go...
Edit: I'm going to change the default "Standard" to "Click here for more options"...
I think it would be easier to remember dmg
and it is 1 less character... Is there any reason for us to not move dmg1
and delete dmg1
DMG1 has over 568 pages link to it vs DMG 21 pages which can be drop to 0 in less then 30 mins
Kobold_Sneak can fix all of the pages using dmg1
in about 3-5 minutes... just saying..
If you get all(most) of those pages with no errors, go for and then lock/rename DMG1.
You undid my revision on the article and without a reason. The article was ill formatted, wrongly categorized, did not stay on topic and was not clearing out what it was about. Mind clarifying why you did so?
Mass Removal of Information
Did you even read the differences before undoing it? All information relevant to the article was there and even more was added. What information was lost that is related to the article?
Yes I did compare both versions and you removed all of DDO information from the page and replace it with what appers to be PnP backgoundinformation. I even double check before I responded to your post. This matter is now closed for debate.
If you did compare them then point out what information was removed. The class restrictions were there in more tidy form while removed from zero information added with additional info about background, background that is identical to what DDO uses/originates. Instead of having multiple topics of same subject I summarized the restrictions and penalties while removed to chunk of tables that had nothing to do with the topic (a list of item and weapon effects? Has nothing to do with alignment). What gives the penalties and to what items and in what circumstances was said in my edit lot shorter and clearer.
In case you can point my edit lost some vital information, I do a better edit of the page and/or open the subject to debate and for a third party review.
I looked at both revisions and would have rolled it back as well. People come here for details, not pages that are only an overview. Perhaps that is partially why we disagree about the == Overview == section heading. You seem to feel that the whole page should be nothing but an overview with anything related linked out for people to chase down multiple links to find as much information as they can, and I feel that ALL of the information pertaining to a subject belongs on one page and many section headings are in order. Is my thought on your perspective correct?
Collected the discussion to Talk:Alignment#Bladedge's revert
as this jumping starts be tiresome.